Measured in hours, distribution rather than average. The tail is what costs you, and the tail is usually a handoff or an out of hours gap.
Lean Six Sigma by sector
Lean Six Sigma in sales
Selling is treated as art, which is why it is rarely measured properly. Much of it is a process: a lead arrives, it is qualified, quoted, followed up and closed or lost. The art sits inside that, and improves when the process around it stops getting in the way.
Chapter 1
What actually breaks here
The commonest finding in a sales process is response time. A lead arrives and waits: hours in the good cases, days in the ordinary ones, while the buyer, who contacted three suppliers on the same afternoon, is being answered by somebody else. No amount of skill at the meeting recovers a lead that went cold before the meeting was offered.
The second is the quote. In most organisations a quote crosses two or three functions, waits for a price approval, and comes back with an error rate nobody measures. Quote turnaround and quote accuracy are ordinary process metrics, and they move the win rate more reliably than any training course.
The third is that the pipeline is measured as a total rather than as a set of stages. A pipeline value of two million tells you nothing. Conversion from stage to stage, and the time work spends in each, tells you where deals actually die, and it is usually one specific transition that everyone had a feeling about and nobody had counted.
Chapter 2
The numbers worth having
Qualified to demo, demo to proposal, proposal to close. One weak transition is a process fault. Weakness everywhere is a targeting fault.
With the error rate beside it, because a fast wrong quote costs more than a slow right one.
The ageing profile finds the deals that are not really live, which is what makes the forecast honest.
Plotted as a run chart it shows whether your forecasting is biased, noisy, or both, and those need different fixes.
The number that decides where to spend, and the one most often replaced by activity counts.
Chapter 3
What a project looks like
A sales project starts by drawing the pipeline as a value stream, not a funnel diagram. A funnel is a picture of hope. A value stream shows each step, who does it, how long the work takes and how long it waits, and the waiting is where the losses are.
Measure means taking the numbers out of the system rather than out of the sales meeting, and it usually exposes that the system is not being kept properly. That is itself a finding: a pipeline that is not maintained cannot be managed, and cleaning it is the first improvement rather than a prerequisite for one.
Analyse needs care with small numbers. A team closing twelve deals a quarter cannot tell a real change in conversion from ordinary variation with a month of data, and treating noise as signal is how sales processes get changed every quarter and improve never. When samples are small, the honest tools are the ones that carry their uncertainty with them.
Improve is usually unglamorous: route leads automatically, pre approve a price band so quotes stop waiting, agree what qualified actually means so two people mean the same thing. Control is a weekly chart of response time and stage conversion, owned by the sales manager rather than by an analyst.
Chapter 4
Where it struggles in sales
The relationship is not a process step. A good seller reads a room, chooses when to push and when to wait, and knows which questions land with which buyer. Standardising that produces a script, and a script produces the flat, distrusted call everyone recognises. Improve the machinery around the conversation and leave the conversation to the person having it.
Small samples are the real technical difficulty. Sales data is thin, seasonal and full of exceptions, and most of the apparent effects in a quarter are noise. Any sales improvement programme that declares victory on one good month has learned nothing, and will unlearn it next month.
The last risk is measurement that changes behaviour for the worse. Measure calls made and you get calls made. Measure meetings booked and you get unqualified meetings. Every sales metric needs its counter measure beside it, or the number improves while the business does not.
Chapter 5
Questions people ask
To the process around selling, yes, and that is where most of the loss is: response time, qualification, quoting, handoffs and follow up are repeatable steps with measurable rates. The conversation with the buyer is craft, and the method should protect it rather than script it.
Lead response time, almost always. It is easy to measure, it is usually far worse than anyone believes, the fix is mechanical rather than cultural, and the effect on conversion shows up quickly enough to fund the rest of the work.
Usable, but not for confident month to month comparisons. With thin data you look at the process measures that accumulate faster, such as response time and quote turnaround, rather than trying to detect a shift in win rate from a handful of deals.
Chapter 6
Where to go next
What it is, how an engagement runs, and what it takes in time and people.
The abbreviation L6S explainedWhat L6S stands for, where the number six comes from, and the belt ladder.
The control chart Statistical Process ControlThe one tool worth learning first, and the ways it is misread.
Where to start Reading tracksShort paths through the writing, ordered so you do not land in the middle.
Put this on one of your own processes
A free 30 minute discovery call, no commitment and no jargon. It usually ends with a number nobody in the organisation currently has.
Book a free discovery call